Legal Opinion

Martin v. Martin (In re Martin)

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided March 11, 2019No. E069481PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcKINSTER, Acting P. J.

*1197Upon ending their marriage, respondent Craig Martin (husband) agreed to pay appellant Cynthia Martin (wife) spousal support for a period of four years. After discovering that wife had remarried, husband stopped paying spousal support and requested reimbursement of the total amount he had paid since her remarriage. The trial court granted husband's request and entered an order requiring wife to repay $ 27,000, plus $ 2,700 in attorney fees. Wife challenges the postjudgment order arguing that husband's spousal support obligation did not terminate by operation of law upon her remarriage because…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of LippelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Marriage of GlasserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Briones v. ThorntonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. County of Lake v. PallaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Sharples v. SharplesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LNSU 1, LLC v. Alta Del Mar Coastal Collection Community Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API