Legal Opinion
Sickle v. Gilbert
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 2011No. C062657PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBIE, J.
In this action, plaintiff Beth Van Sickle filed a complaint against her former attorney, defendant Gregory F. Gilbert, arising out of his alleged mismanagement, years earlier, of certain properties Van Sickle had received in a divorce in which Gilbert had represented her. Van Sickle included in her complaint a cause of action for an accounting, and, as is generally true in accounting cases, she did not include in her complaint a demand for a specific amount of money from Gilbert in connection with that cause of action. (See Ely v. Gray (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 1257, 1261-1262…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Redevelopment Agency v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Dep't of Forestry & Fire Prot. v. Howell, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Airs Aromatics, LLC v. CBL Data Recovery Techs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Campi v. CampiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Sass v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- Kahn v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.