Legal Opinion

Paul v. Kirkendall

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1953No. 7957PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff $20,000 for damages arising out of an automobile collision, for which defendant admitted liability, and from the trial court’s 'denial of a motion for new trial on the basis of excessive damages.

Appellant claims here that damages awarded were “so excessive as to appear prejudicial.” Rule 59(a) (5), Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, provides that a new trial may be granted on grounds of excessive or inadequate damages, appearing to have been given under the influence of passion or prejudice. It is not enough, under this rule nor under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chatelain v. ThackerayUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Duffy v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Saltas v. AffleckUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Walkenhorst v. KeslerUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Miller v. Southern Pac. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gray F. Madison, Sr., and Elizabeth B. Madison, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs v. Deseret Livestock Company, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  2. Bennion v. LeGrand Johnson Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bodon Ex Rel. Bodon v. SuhrmannUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Schneider v. SuhrmannUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Paul v. KirkendallUtah Supreme Court · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API