Legal Opinion

Miller v. Southern Pac. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1933No. 5033PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

Plaintiff was injured while employed as a fireman by the defendant company. This action was brought to recover for his injuries. Plaintiff had judgment. Defendant ap peals. The assignments of error are numerous (one hundred and two in number). The assignments may be grouped into five classes: (1) Those which relate to the admission and rejection of evidence (eight in number); (2) those which relate to the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury as requested by the defendant (fourteen in number) ; (3) those which relate to the instructions given to the jury by the court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. LindsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. WilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Frese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Davis v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. HadleySupreme Court of the United States · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Stickle v. Union Pacific R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Pauly v. McCarthyUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Raab v. Utah Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Duffy v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API