Legal Opinion

Walkenhorst v. Kesler

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1937No. 5759PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

In this action it is alleged by Taylor Walkenhorst in his complaint that the defendant and appellant, A. B. Kesler, is a chiropractor in the state of Utah, licensed to treat human ailments without the use of drugs or medicine and without operative surgery. Relating to the injury for which plaintiff applied to defendant for treatment, it is alleged that while carrying a heavy timber in July, 1933, plaintiff accidentally fell and injured his hip, fractured it and suffered pain and illness because of the injury. Plaintiff claims that for a consideration the defendant undertook to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Perkins v. TruebloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Parks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Martin v. Walter CourtneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Bragg v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hood v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. ROSENBERG BY ROSENBERG v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. State v. LingmanUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Jones v. ChidesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Kelly v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API