Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Suhrmann

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1958No. 8716PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Kurt A. Schneider sued for damages resulting from contracting trichinosis by eating mettwurst sausage 1 furnished by the defendants. Upon the basis of a jury’s answers to special interrogatories, the trial court entered judgment against Emil Suhr-mann the retailer, but refused to do so against the other defendants Noorda and Guss, the supplier.

Plaintiff’s appeal assigned two main errors: (1) failure to award judgment against the supplier; (2) inadequacy of the damages given against Suhrmann, the retailer.

The contention that plaintiff is entitled to a judgment against the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Pauly v. McCarthyUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Geary v. CainUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Paul v. KirkendallUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Stamp v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYUtah Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. First National Bank Ex Rel. Huckleby v. Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Gregory v. White Truck & Equipment Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Bodon Ex Rel. Bodon v. SuhrmannUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hicks v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. McGrath v. Wallace Murray Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API