Legal Opinion

Paul v. Kirkendall

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1957No. 8572PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORTHEN, Justice.

Appeal from an interlocutory order denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant Kirkendall will be referred to as defendant.

Plaintiffs herein recovered a judgment entered upon a jury verdict against defendant in the sum of $20,000 for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. That judgment was affirmed on appeal to this court: 1 Utah 2d 1, 261 P.2d 670.

Garnishee, appellant herein, had issued a policy of insurance in favor of defendant, and paid the judgment to the limit of its policy coverage of $10,000, together with interest.

Plaintiffs, after…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Paul v. KirkendallUtah Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Murray v. MossmanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Gilley Ex Rel. Gilley v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. Ammerman Ex Rel. Ammerman v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Brown v. CandeloraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API