Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J.
—A homeowner in a 530-unit condominium complex sued to prevent the homeowners association from enforcing a restriction against keeping cats, dogs, and other animals in the condominium development. The owner asserted that the restriction, which was contained in the project’s declaration1 recorded by the condominium project’s developer, was “unreasonable” as applied to her because she kept her three cats indoors and because her cats were “noiseless” and “created no nuisance.” Agreeing with the premise underlying the owner’s complaint, the Court of Appeal concluded that the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Gantt v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. OlguinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Damon v. Ocean Hills Journalism ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.