Legal Opinion

Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 6,699PublishedCited by 100 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Sixteenth District Court, County of Mono. Reed, J.

1Opinion of the Court

McKee, J.:

This case arises out of an action which was commenced in the late District Court of Mono County by the respondents, who were plaintiffs in the Court below, to obtain a judgment *503and foreclosure of mechanics’ liens upon the property of the Comanche Mill and Mining Company, the defendant and appellant. Process was served on the company in San Francisco March 22nd, 1879. May 2nd, 1879, default of defendant for not answering was entered. Motion to set aside this default and allow defendant to answer was made upon affidavits, and denied by the Court on May 10th, 1879. When the decision…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Engleman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Bishop v. CookNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Lamson v. FallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Higgins v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Lauren Casola v. Dexcom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API