Heilbron v. Sumner
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. S. J. Higgins, City Attorney, and A. F. H. Wright, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment given in the court below upon an agreed case submitted to it, as provided by sections 1138, 1139, and 1140 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The plaintiffs are members of the common council of the city of San Diego, and the defendants are the members of the board of water commissioners of said city.
The matter submitted for decision was the question whether the common council of the city, or the board of water commissioners of the city, is empowered to expend a certain fund in the city treasury obtained by the sale of bonds issued by the city,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Civic Center Ass'n of Los Angeles v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Morgan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Brougher v. Board of Public Works of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.