Legal Opinion

Brougher v. Board of Public Works of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12800PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The petitioners are asking for a writ of mandamus against the Board of Public Works of the City and County of San Francisco requiring said board to grant the application of petitioners for a permit to construct upon certain real property belonging to petitioners, described in said application and situated in said city and county, a building to be used as a hotel. The original petition was filed herein on the twenty-third day of December, 1927, and was denied by this court. Thereupon petitioners asked for a rehearing of said matter. On January 26, 1928, the order denying said petition was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. City of Des Moines v. Manhattan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Brett v. Building CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. CEEED v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Trans-Oceanic Oil Corp. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API