Legal Opinion

State v. Cetto

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 4, 1984No. CR82-1172; CA A28000PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Defendant was tried by the court and convicted of assault in the fourth degree. ORS 163.160. He assigns as error 1 the denial of his motion to exclude witnesses. OEC 615.

Opening statements were waived. The state’s first witness was the mother of the 3-year-old alleged assault victim. After she gave her name and address, defendant moved to exclude the witnesses:

“[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Your Honor, excuse me, I would like to have the witnesses excluded.
“[THE COURT]: Supposed to be before the start of the trial.
“[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Yes, your Honor.
“[THE COURT]: I’ll deny your motion.”

The tape-recorded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. BurdgeOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. State v. DickensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. State v. GlazierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. SalmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API