State v. Cetto
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Defendant was tried by the court and convicted of assault in the fourth degree. ORS 163.160. He assigns as error 1 the denial of his motion to exclude witnesses. OEC 615.
Opening statements were waived. The state’s first witness was the mother of the 3-year-old alleged assault victim. After she gave her name and address, defendant moved to exclude the witnesses:
“[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Your Honor, excuse me, I would like to have the witnesses excluded.
“[THE COURT]: Supposed to be before the start of the trial.
“[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Yes, your Honor.
“[THE COURT]: I’ll deny your motion.”
The tape-recorded…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. BurdgeOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. DickensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. GlazierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. SalmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.