State v. Shipp
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for first degree burglary, ORS 164.225. In a separate appeal, consolidated for hearing, defendant challenges revocation of his probation granted in a prior case. He assigns three specifications of error relating to the burglary conviction: (1) the admission of extrajudicial statements made by the codefendant, (2) the admission of testimony from the owner of the burglarized grocery market concerning items missing from inventory, and (3) denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal based on the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the charge.
Respecting…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. KrummacherOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. Van HooserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Gardner v. Dollina & ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. TidymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. PottleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. LytsellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.