Temple Enterprises, Inc. v. Combs
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
The circuit court made no findings of fact, but simply entered a decree dismissing the suit. It appears, however, from the abstract of record that the basis of the decree was the court’s ruling that the plaintiff corporation lacked capacity to enter into a lease or otherwise transact any business or to maintain the suit because of its failure to comply with one of the provisions of § 25-225, Oregon Code 1930. That section has to do with corporations issuing shares of capital stock without any nominal or par value, and reads in part as follows:
“In cases of original incorporation of any such…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Epstein v. . GluckinNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. WoodburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Livesley v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Wallace v. ScogginsOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- W. L. Wells Co. v. Gastonia Cotton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Robert Lawrence Associates, Inc. v. Del VecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Harmon v. Tanner Motor Tours of Nevada, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 1963
- Wittick v. MilesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Tigglebeck v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- County of Lincoln v. FISCHEROregon Supreme Court · 1959
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.