Legal Opinion

Grace v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 13, 1973PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

The defendant was tried in Superior Court on the charge of robbery. The Trial Court ordered sequestration of all witnesses but, over the defendant’s objecttion, excepted the chief investigative police officer. The defendant also contended that if the officer were not sequestered he should testify first. The State’s only ground for resisting the latter application was that “It wouldn’t be a meaningful situation”. The Trial Court rejected both of the defendant’s contentions.

The defendant was convicted under 11 Del.C. § 102(c) as an accomplice although indicted as a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Sam GarafoloCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  2. Stuart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  3. The People v. DixonIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Pethel v. WatersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  5. Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shields v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  2. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  3. Burke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  4. Van Arsdall v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  5. Derrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API