Legal Opinion

Hilkmann v. Hilkmann

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 21, 2004No. 29 WAP 2003PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

This appeal raises substantive and procedural questions concerning the domestic effect of a guardianship judgment issued by a court of another nation.

Appellant, Leila Hilkmann, and Appellee, Dirk Hilkmann, are the parents of Daniel Hilkmann, born in 1981, and a younger daughter, Natalie. As a result of complications from birth, Daniel suffers from neurological impairment affecting his mental and physical condition. In 1994, Mr. and Mrs. Hilkmann divorced and, pursuant to an agreement that was incorporated into a Dallas County, Texas, divorce decree, Mrs. Hilkmann…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. TremblaySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Christoff EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme Et L'antisemitismeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Program Administration Services, Inc. v. Dauphin County General AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA v. Financial Software Systems, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Standard Chartered Bank v. Ahmad Hamad Al Gosaibi & Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Eclipse Liquidity, Inc. v. Geden Holdings LimitedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API