Legal Opinion

Crutchfield v. Eaton Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 6, 2002PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DEL SOLE, P.J.

¶ 1 Appellants appeal from the order of court granting Appellees’ preliminary objections and dismissing Appellants’ claims for personal injuries clue to asbestos exposure. Upon review, we affirm.

¶ 2 This appeal involves three separate cases. The cases have been consolidated for appeal purposes.

Chapman

¶ 3 Appellants Nathan and Harriet Chapman filed a short-form complaint in Philadelphia County in July of 1987. Appellants sought damages for asbestosis that Nathan allegedly contracted while working with asbestos-related products throughout his employment history. In 1995,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Pacor, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Giffear v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Penox Technologies, Inc. v. Foster Medical Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Christianson v. ElySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. PNC Bank v. Bluestream Technology, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Richner v. McCanceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Rostock v. AnzaloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Thermal C/M Services, Inc. v. Penn Maid Dairy ProductsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API