Crutchfield v. Eaton Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
DEL SOLE, P.J.
¶ 1 Appellants appeal from the order of court granting Appellees’ preliminary objections and dismissing Appellants’ claims for personal injuries clue to asbestos exposure. Upon review, we affirm.
¶ 2 This appeal involves three separate cases. The cases have been consolidated for appeal purposes.
Chapman
¶ 3 Appellants Nathan and Harriet Chapman filed a short-form complaint in Philadelphia County in July of 1987. Appellants sought damages for asbestosis that Nathan allegedly contracted while working with asbestos-related products throughout his employment history. In 1995,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simmons v. Pacor, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Giffear v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Penox Technologies, Inc. v. Foster Medical Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Christianson v. ElySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- PNC Bank v. Bluestream Technology, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Richner v. McCanceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Rostock v. AnzaloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Thermal C/M Services, Inc. v. Penn Maid Dairy ProductsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.