Zarnecki v. Shepegi
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
In this residential mortgage foreclosure action, defendant, Doreen Shepegi, appeals a pretrial order which precludes her from asserting that the signature on the mortgage instrument is a forgery. The lower court found that the doctrine of collateral estoppel barred defendant from presenting this defense. A panel of this Court assigned to *232hear argument certified the appeal to the Court en banc to determine: (1) whether the order of the court below is final and immediately appealable; and (2) whether the lower court erred in entering the order. After careful consideration, we…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. International Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Stidham v. Millvale Sportsmen's ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Apaydin v. Citibank Federal Savings Bank (In Re Apayin)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Incollingo v. MaurerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Liazis v. Kosta, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.