Legal Opinion

Gabriel v. O'HARA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1987No. 2733PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

At issue in this matter is the appropriate statute of limitations for private actions under the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL). Act of December 17,1968, No. 387, as amended 1976, Nov. 24, P.L. 1166, No. 260, § 1, 73 P.S. § 201-1 et seq.

I

Appellants are individuals and owners of residential property located at 5714 Marshall Street in Philadelphia. The premises were previously owned by appellee. This action arose in connection with the purchase by appellants of the property from appellee.

On or about June 19, 1980, appellants agreed to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Pekular v. EichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Jeffrey J. Sikirica, Esq., as Trustee of Pittsburgh Beauty Academy, Inc. v. Nationwide Insurance Company Jeffrey J. SikiricaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. Ash v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Schwartz v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. DiLucido v. Terminix International, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Valley Forge Towers South Condominium v. Ron-Ike Foam Insulators, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API