Legal Opinion

Societe Titanor v. Sherman MacHine & Iron Works

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1935No. 21842PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Plaintiff in error will be referred to herein as plaintiff, and the defendant in error as defendant.

Plaintiff .commenced this action in the district court of Oklahoma county to recover the price of one thousand and twenty-five (1,025) pounds of steel shipped by plaintiff to defendant in compliance with the alleged terms of a written contract.

The contract was an order written on the stationery of the defendant company and was as follows, omitting letterhead:

“Oklahoma City, Okla.
“January 21, 1927.
“Societe ‘Titanor’,
“55 Rue de Chateaudun,
“Paris, France.
“Gentlemen;
“Please supply the following…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McNinch v. Northwest Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Guthrie & Western Railroad v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Prescott v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Graham v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hixson v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  2. McDonald v. BruhnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Save Sales Co. v. FutralSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Gold Kist Peanut Growers Association v. WaldmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Jackson v. CleageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API