Legal Opinion
Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Collins
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 1, 1915No. 4862PublishedCited by 35 opinions
Error from District Court, Bryan County; Jesse M. Hatchett, Judge. Action by Peter Collins against the Missouri, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff,' and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
The first .five assignments of error have to do with the admission of evidence, which it is claimed constituted prejudicial error. The first assignment relates to certain testimony of the witness Cole. The questions, answers, objections, and rulings pertinent, thereto are as follows:
“Q. During that time before the accident and since had you ever seen any engine back in against cars? A. Yes, sir. (Defendant objects as incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial as to what he has seen since. Overruled. Defendant excepts.) Q. From that experience that you had in seeing engines come in contact with…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Denver & Rio Grande Railway v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Independent Cotton Oil Co. v. BeachamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Montgomery v. Lansing City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Mullen v. ThaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. CauthenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Gafford v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Stinchcomb v. PattesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.