Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Bruhn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 5, 1942No. 30406PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff Bruhn to recover damages from defendants McDonald and John Kenyon for conversion of an automobile. From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for actual and exemplary damages against both defendants, McDonald only appeals.

Plaintiff was the owner of a 1937 Master Chevrolet car which he had theretofore purchased from McDonald, a Chevrolet dealer, through Kenyon, who was a salesman for McDonald. On or about April 15, 1938, he delivered this car to Kenyon, who agreed to make a deal or deals with the car so as to procure a later model car for plaintiff.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Empire Oil & Refining Co. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Johnson v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. McJunkin v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Holmes v. ChadwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Colby v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jordan v. CatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Bierman v. Aramark Refreshment Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  3. Kurn v. RadencicSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Moyer v. CordellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Hixson v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API