Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Cleage

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1943No. 30615PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The action by plaintiffs is based upon services rendered upon an oral contract confirmed by letter, or upon the letter as constituting a written contract.

The facts involved and contentions of the parties present a complicated pattern and necessitate some rather detailed statements as to the situation of the parties and other facts.

Harley T. Price and Howard Fry of Tulsa, Okla.; were men of some experience in the sand and gravel business. They desired to obtain a contract to furnish sand and rock for use in the construction of an improvement now well known in Oklahoma as the Grand River Dam,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Castle v. BullardSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Jaquith v. WordenWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Wingate v. RenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co. v. FerrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Berry-Beall Dry Goods Co. v. FrancisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Cleage v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Acme Cab Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API