Connelly v. Lerche
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rules to show cause why these attachments should not' be set aside.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Abbett, J.
An application is made in these cases by the-defendants, to quash the attachments therein, on the ground that they were illegally issued. In No. 1, the case of Edmond. Connelly v. Albrecht J. Lerche and Teressa O’Rourke, devisees of Felix E. O’Rourke, deceased, the affidavit for the writ states that Felix E. O’Rourke, deceased, in his lifetime, was indebted to the said Edmond Connelly in the sum of $15,000, as near as deponent can ascertain, and was a non-resident of this state, and that Albrecht J. Lerche, executor of the last will and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Davis v. MegrozSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- Jackson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
- Muller v. LeedsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
3Cited by11 opinions
- Konopka Et Ux. v. McAteerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Polhman v. De BouchelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
- Moore v. Richardson & BaldwinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
- Lunger v. PageUnited States District Court · 1938
- Sullivan v. MoffatSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.