Moore v. Richardson & Baldwin
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On attachment.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syokel, J.
In Januar}r, 1900, the plaintiff filed his affidavit in the Supreme Court setting forth that the defendants were non-residents, and that they owed him the sum of $5,000.
The defendants subsequently gave bond to the sheriff, in accordance with section 33 of the Attachment act, and entered their appearance to the action.
The plaintiff thereupon filed his declaration, to which the-defendants pleaded, and the trial of the cause was noticed for May Term of the Cumberland Circuit.
At the opening of the May Term the defendants obtained a rule to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Connelly v. LercheSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- Jackson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
3Cited by5 opinions
- Herman v. ArndtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Cook v. Borough of AllendaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- Sturr v. Borough of ElmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- Omnium De Participations Industries De Luxe (S. A.) v. SpoturnoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
- Bernstein & Loubet, Inc. v. MinkinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936