Konopka Et Ux. v. McAteer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Linn,
Plaintiffs, on December 28, 1931, to recover for a tort, obtained a writ of foreign attachment, returnable first Monday in March, 1932. The sheriff returned nihil habet as to defendant, that he had attached the real estate described in the praecipe, and had served Prank J. Coll and Joseph Lekiela, tenants in possession. No affidavit of cause of action was filed. With their praecipe for the writ, plaintiffs also filed a statement of claim.
On August 22,1932, a general appearance was entered for the defendant; the garnishees have not appeared. April 4, 1933, defendant,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mindlin v. Saxony Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Schenley v. Commonwealth ex rel. City of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Rankin v. CulverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Pottash v. Albany Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Connelly v. LercheSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ReidenbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Lebowitz v. Forbes Leasing and Finance CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Brogan v. Bright-Brooks Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Ionian Bank, Ltd. v. MamatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Cuberka v. Pennsylvania Slovak RomanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.