Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Motion to attach for contempt, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Magie, J.

In a suit commenced by attachment the plaintiff moves to attach the defendant for contempt, in refusing to be examined under oath by the auditor when brought before him by warrant, under the provisions of section 46 of the Attachment act. Rev., p. 50.

Correct practice would probably require a motion for a rule ■to show cause. In re Cheeseman, 20 Vroom 115. But no objection to the practice adopted has been made, and the matter has been fully argued. We are warranted therefore in disposing of the motion on its merits, as if a rule to show cause…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Connelly v. LercheSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  2. Elliott v. BodineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  3. State v. CaporaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. Moore v. Richardson & BaldwinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  5. Goldmark v. Magnolia Metal Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API