Legal Opinion

Davis v. Megroz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In attachment. On motion to expunge from the record an appearance entered by one of the defendants in behalf of the other defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Depue, J.

A writ of attachment issued out of this court October 22d, 1892, and directed to the sheriff of the county of Morris, was executed by attaching real and personal property at Stirling.

The affidavit on which the writ issued set out a debt due the plaintiff in the sum of $48,019, from the defendants, as partners, under the firm name of Megroz, .Portier, Schlachter & Co. The property attached was appraised at $122,000.

On the 4th of November, 1892, George .E. Conkling, an attorney of this court, entered an appearance in the attachment suit in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Shields v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. Marquand v. President of New-York Manufacturing Co.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1820

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mares v. MaresMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Mervyn Investment Co. v. BiberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Connelly v. LercheSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  4. Stoddard & Son v. Village of North TroySupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  5. Goldmark v. Magnolia Metal Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API