Pratt v. Dittmer
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
The material facts of this ease are as follows:
On the nineteenth day of May, 1915, Adolph Dittmer, a resident of Orange, California, entered into an agreement with the Brenard Manufacturing Company of Iowa City, Iowa, whereby the company agreed to conduct a voting contest for Dittmer. It was stipulated that the Brenard Manufacturing Company would furnish him with a certain piano and other articles, which it did, and would direct the management of the voting contest, and in that connection it was stipulated as follows: “The Brenard Mfg. Co. agrees to send their organizer to us within the first…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Citizens Trust & Savings Bank v. StackhouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Flood v. PetryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Commercial Bank of Essex v. PaddickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Merchants National Bank v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Westlake Mercantile Finance Corp. v. MerrittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Sullivan v. ShannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Drukker v. Howe & Haun Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Barclays Discount Bank Ltd. v. Bogharian Bros.District Court, C.D. California · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.