Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Shannon
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 19, 1938No. Civ. 2140PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This action was instituted to collect from defendant the sum of $2,000, principal, together with accrued interest, being a balance unpaid on a bond dated February 10, 1925, executed and made payable in New York. A de murrer to the amended complaint, on the ground that the cause of action was barred by the provisions of subdivision one of section 337 of the Code of Civil Procedure,' was sustained with leave to amend. Plaintiff declined to amend and has appealed from the judgment entered against him.
The amended complaint was filed on March 4, 1937. The original complaint is not in the record…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- McKee v. DoddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Pinney v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Mercantile Acceptance Co. v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Belloc v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bank of Nevada v. FriedmanNevada Supreme Court · 1966
- Young v. the Young Holdings Corp., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- In re StrotzDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1943
- Alaska Credit Bureau v. FennerDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1948
- Leggate v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.