Legal Opinion

McNight v. Parsons

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 19, 1907PublishedCited by 111 opinions

Appeal from Iowa District Court.— HoN. O. A. ByihgtoN, Judge. ActioN at law upon a promissory note. Prom a judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict, tbe defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Weavee,* C. J.

Tbe note in suit, wbicb is negotiable in form, was made and delivered to O. C. Bigler & Sons, who transferred tbe same by indorsement to tbe Farmers’ Bank of Victor, Iowa, wbicb, in turn, indorsed and transferred it to tbe plaintiff. Tbe answer of tbe defendant is, in substance, that tbe note was given by him to Bigler & Sons for tbe purchase price of a certain thoroughbred cow upon a warranty and representation that tbe animal was a breeder, and upon a further agreement by Bigler & Sons that they would retain possession of her for several months, breed her to a certain named…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Vosburgh v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Arnd v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Moore v. First Nat. Bank of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Jones v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Todd v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. City National Bank of Columbus v. JordanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API