Legal Opinion

Drukker v. Howe & Haun Investment Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1934No. Docket No. 8933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The plaintiff, who was the owner of lot 625 of Tract No. 6380, sometimes known as Beverly Vista, in Los Angeles County, applied to Howe & Haun Investment Company, a corporation, for a loan of $5,000, to be secured by a deed of trust of the property, her purpose being to erect a dwelling thereon. A written application for a loan signed by her recited that the loan was to be used for said purpose, and that the money should be advanced in installments as the building progressed, the installments to be as follows: “$200.00 to the agent above named as a commission for procuring the said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Utah Construction Co. v. Western Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hooker v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Goodale v. ThornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Flood v. PetryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Mendiondo v. GreitmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Hammond v. TateCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  4. Stewart & Horton Trust Account v. AutrandNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  5. A. T. Jergins Trust v. RoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API