Legal Opinion
Barclays Discount Bank Ltd. v. Bogharian Bros.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 8, 1983No. 81-1747, 81-2263, 81-2264, 81-2599 and 81-3848AWTPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TASHIMA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek summary judgment in these five actions for collection of promissory notes. 1 Plaintiffs are banks operating out of the Diamond Exchange in Ramat Gan, Israel. Defendants, three American diamond merchants, issued a total of seven notes 2 to Leo Siegman, a leading Israeli diamond dealer, as security for diamonds purchased by the defendants. Siegman endorsed three notes to plaintiff Barclays Discount Bank Ltd. (“Barclays”) and four notes to plaintiff Israel Discount Bank Ltd. (“IDB”) as collateral for his pre-existing obligations…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- John E. FERGUSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the FLYING TIGER LINE, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Henderson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Swiss Credit Bank v. Chemical BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Pratt v. DittmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. American Utilities, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Barclays Discount Bank Ltd. v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- McNall v. TathamDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987
- Barclays Discount Bank Ltd. v. Sam Levy, Individually and Doing Business as Sam's Gem Trading, Israel Discount Bank Ltd. v. Sam Levy, Individually and Doing Business as Sam's Gem Trading, Barclays Discount Bank Ltd. v. Bogharian Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988