Legal Opinion
State v. Peagler
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 28, 1996No. 95-1197PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
In the case sub judice, the parties stipulated to the facts stated above1; moreover, the defense attorney clarified his arguments by stating: “Judge, my *498objection would be to the on-the-scene inventory of the vehicle. I don’t believe that that’s the proper procedure. I believe its got to go to the tow yard and the opening of any containers that are not weapons I believe is contrary to established law * * *. That appears to be the only issue in the case, is the situs, the timing of the inventory and the scope of the inventory.”
The prosecutor stated that he intended to put a police officer on…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Xenia v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- State v. FoustOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. Wintermeyer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- Dardinger v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue SheildOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. Estrada-VitalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. BingOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.