State v. 1981 Dodge Ram Van
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The state contends that it is an abuse of discretion for a court of appeals to decide an appeal on an issue it raises sua sponte where that issue was not raised in the trial court by either party, was not assigned as error by the appellant, was not briefed by either party, and was not factually supported by the record.
The state’s complaint was brought under authority of R.C. 2933.41(C), which allows a governmental unit in possession of certain seized property to bring an action to terminate the rights of other persons in such property. The state claimed that the mismatching VINs established…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. ChildsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- State v. GuysingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Michael G. Levine v. Patricia Torvik, Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Belvedere Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n v. R.E. Roark Companies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- Pena v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- State v. PeaglerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.