C. Miller Chevrolet, Inc. v. City of Willoughby Hills
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
0’Neill, C. J.
The Court of Appeals, in reversing the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, stated two reasons for fts judgment. First, it held that appellant was an improper party to seek the variance, and, therefore, an improper party to appeal the denial thereof to the Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and from there to the courts. Second, the Court of Appeals held that appellant failed to present evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of validity that attached to the existing zoning. These reasons given by the Court of Appeals frame the issues presented to this court.
I
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. City of Rocky RiverOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Paulin v. Midland Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
- McCauley v. AshOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
3Cited by90 opinions
- State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. PeaglerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Matthews v. MatthewsOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Gerijo, Inc. v. City of FairfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. 1981 Dodge Ram VanOhio Supreme Court · 1988
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.