Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel W. Johns, Jr.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 2014No. 2011AP002760-DPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Per curiam
¶ 1. In this disciplinary proceeding, the referee concluded that the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) had proven violations on one of two counts contained in the complaint filed by the OLR. Based on that violation, the referee recommended that Attorney Daniel W Johns, Jr., be either privately or publicly reprimanded. The OLR appeals from the referee's report and recommendation, arguing that the court should determine that Attorney Johns committed both counts of misconduct and should be suspended for 60 days.
¶ 2. After independently reviewing the record, we accept the facts as found by the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re MorrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re: Michael J. HoareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James C. RitlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert W. HorschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Benjamin A. HanesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Osman A. MirzaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Brett R. BlommeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.