Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Godfrey Y. Muwonge

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2016No. 2007AP000776-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review a report filed by Referee Dennis J. Flynn, recommending that the court reinstate, with conditions, Attorney Godfrey Y. Mu-wonge's license to practice law in Wisconsin. After careful consideration we adopt the referee's recommendation. We agree that Attorney Muwonge met his burden under Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.36(6) to show by clear, satisfactory, and convincing evidence that he is currently fit to resume the practice of law, with conditions. Accordingly, we grant his reinstatement petition. We impose the full costs of this proceeding, which are $8,118.32 as of April 27,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. SchlieveWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. ChavezWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Godfrey Y. MuwongeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Godfrey Y. MuwongeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Godfrey Y. MuwongeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. J. D. B.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API