Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Linehan
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 2015No. 1989AP001848-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review a report filed by Referee James G. Curtis, recommending that the court reinstate, with conditions, Daniel W. Linehan's license to practice law in Wisconsin. After careful review of the matter, we agree that Attorney Linehan's license should be reinstated and that conditions should be placed upon his practice of law. We also conclude that Attorney Linehan should be required to pay the full costs of this reinstatement proceeding, which are $15,714.12 as of April 14, 2015.
¶ 2. Attorney Linehan was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1977 and practiced in Madison. In 1989,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. SchlieveWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. ChavezWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against LinehanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Attorney DoeWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
- BAPR v. Nancy A. SchlieveWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. LinehanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. SchlieveWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. SchlieveWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015