Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Productive Alternatives, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 2006No. A04-1691PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Chief Justice.

We first consider whether the Minnesota Whistleblower Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 181.931-.935 (2004), precludes common-law wrongful-discharge claims premised on our holding in Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp., 408 N.W.2d 569 (Minn.1987). We hold, as did the court of appeals, and as now agreed by the parties, that the Minnesota Whistleblower Act does not preclude common-law wrongful-discharge claims premised on Phipps. We next consider whether appellant’s common-law wrongful-discharge claim in this case states a claim on which relief can be granted under…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gantt v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Kratzer v. Welsh Companies, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Dukowitz v. Hannon Security ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. Luisa Chavez-Lavagnino v. Motivation Education TrainingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API