Legal Opinion
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 14, 2012No. A09-0607PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRAS, Justice.
The question presented by this case is whether the Minnesota Constitution provides the right to a jury trial for a claim to recover attorney fees based on a contract. *52In 2004, appellants Leland Haugen, llene Haugen, and Haugen Nutrition and Equipment, LLC (“HNE”), defaulted on promissory notes held by respondent United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake (“UPB”). The various loan agreements between the parties contained provisions in which appellants agreed to pay UPB’s reasonable costs and attorney fees associated with the protection of UPB’s security interests and the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ransom v. VFS, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Red Roof Franchising, LLC v. AA Hospitality Northshore, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- State v. Castillo-AlvarezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Melrose Gates, LLC v. Chor MouaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.