Colby & Dickinson, Inc. v. McCulloch
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
This action was instituted by appellant, as plaintiff, to foreclose a materialman’s lien. The cross-appellants, by cross-complaints or intervention, sought similar relief. The respondent Peoples Savings & Loan Association, by cross-complaint, sought a foreclosure of its mortgage on the same property.- After a trial on the merits, the lower court entered its decree establishing and foreclosing a certain lien as prior to the mortgage, in favor of parties not appealing. It denied the lien claims- of the appellant and of ..the cross-appellants, but gave them personal-judgments against defendants…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brace & Hergert Mill Co. v. BurbankWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Architectural Decorating Co. v. NicklasonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Spokane Valley Lumber & Box Co. v. DawsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Miller v. SchoberWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Hewitt Lea Lumber Co. v. SandellWashington Supreme Court · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stouffer-Bowman, Inc. v. WebberWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'n v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- R. H. Freitag Manufacturing Co. v. Boeing Airplane Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Hayes v. GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Thompson v. O'LearyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.