Legal Opinion
Kaye v. Town of Manchester
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 2, 1990No. 7743PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The plaintiff, David Kaye, appeals from the trial court’s granting of the defendants’1 motions for summary judgment. The plaintiff claims that the trial court erred (1) in concluding that the claim against defendant Leonard Seader was barred by the statute of limitations and granting his motion for summary judgment, and (2) in granting the motion for summary judgment filed by the town of Manchester and the town board of education. We find no error.
This case involves a complex procedural history. The plaintiff gave notice to the town and board of his intention to commence suit on January…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fraser v. HenningerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Jonap v. SilverConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Kostyal v. CassSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- World Fire & Marine Insurance v. Alliance Sandblasting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Pack v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Kolaniak v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Rossman v. MorascoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Archibald v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Carter Hill Associates v. Town of Clinton (In Re Carter Hill Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- Palazzo v. DelroseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.