Carter Hill Associates v. Town of Clinton (In Re Carter Hill Associates)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
ALBERT S. DABROWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this matter the defendant, Town of Clinton (hereinafter, the “Defendant” or “Town”), seeks the dismissal of the instant adversary proceeding on the basis of the Plaintiffs admitted failure to comply with the terms of Connecticut General Statutes (hereinafter, “C.G.S”) §§ 7-465(a) and 7-101a(d) which, it is argued, required the filing of a notice of intent to sue with the Defendant’s Town Clerk within six (6) months of the accrual of the subject causes of action. Because the cited…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Master-Halco, Inc. v. Picard (In Re Picard)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Broady v. Harvey (In Re Broady)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Charles E. Smith, J r . v. Mary MaynesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- Quezada v. Waterbury Police DeptDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023