Legal Opinion

World Fire & Marine Insurance v. Alliance Sandblasting Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 5, 1927PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

On April 13th, 1925, the Alliance Sandblasting Company contracted for the removal of the paint from a house in Hartford’, owned by one Merrow. The contract called for the use of lime and caustic soda, but this method proving ineffective it was subsequently agreed by the parties that the paint should be removed by burning with torches. On April 21st, while two of defendant’s employees were engaged in the work, using kerosene torches, a fire broke out in the roof of the building above the point where the men were working and the premises were damaged thereby. The plaintiff, in consequence, paid…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Manistee Mill Co. v. HobdySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Western Railway v. SistrunkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Wladyka. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  4. Callahan v. JursekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  5. Ex parte NicrosiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Home Savings Bank v. SavranskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Ziman v. WhitleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  3. Reilly v. Antonio Pepe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Meglio v. ComeauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  5. Lussier v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API