Palazzo v. Delrose
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Dee Palazzo, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant Starbucks Corporation.1 On *224appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that although the claim against the defendant was filed more than four years from the date that his injuries were sustained, the claim is not barred by the two year statute of limitations set forth in General Statutes § 52-5842 because it relates back to a claim filed before the statute of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jonap v. SilverConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Kaye v. Town of ManchesterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Franc v. Bethel Holding Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Krevis v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cabrera v. LawlorDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Hunt v. ManchesterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Palazzo v. DelroseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Ruiz v. TaranovichDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021