Legal Opinion
In re Sarah Ann K.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 25, 2000No. AC 19371PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STOUGHTON, J.
The respondent father appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights with respect to his minor daughter.1 On appeal, the respondent claims that the court improperly (1) interpreted and applied General Statutes § 17a-112 (c) (3) (B), (2) found that he had failed to achieve sufficient personal rehabilitation within the meaning of § 17a-112 (c) (3) (B) and (3) found that there was sufficient evidence to find that he had abandoned his minor child.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Migdalia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- In re Eden F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Hartford Electric Supply Co. v. Allen-Bradley Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- In re Roshawn R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- In re Shyliesh H.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In re Daniel C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Sheila J.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Blunt v. KlapprothNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- In re Amneris P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Gary B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.