In re Sheila J.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The respondent mother1 appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court terminating her parental rights in her minor daughter, S. On appeal, the respondent claims that the court improperly (1) found that the department of children and families (department) made reasonable efforts to reunite her with S, (2) found that the respondent had failed to achieve sufficient personal rehabilitation and (3) considered in the adjudication phase of the proceedings events that *472occurred after the commissioner of children and famines (commissioner) filed the petition to terminate her…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- In re Luis C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- In re Eden F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- In Re Juvenile Appeal (84-3)Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- In re Michael M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re Victoria B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- In re Vincent D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Sheena I.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Gary B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Alejandro L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.