Legal Opinion

Rep Andrew Tobin v. Hon Rea

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2013No. CV-12-0273-SAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Justice.

¶ 1 Quality Education & Jobs Supporting 1-16-2012 (“the Committee”) challenged the Legislative Council’s analysis of that initiative (“Proposition 204” or “the Act”), claiming that the analysis was misleading and not impartial. The superior court upheld that challenge in part and ordered the Council to revise or delete the analysis in certain respects. The Council then filed a petition for special action in this Court. On August 17, 2012, we issued an order accepting jurisdiction but denying relief, thereby upholding the superior court’s order. This opinion explains…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Plugge Ex Rel. Arkansas for Representative Democracy v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Cronin v. SheldonArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Sotomayor v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Airness & Accountability in Insurance Reform v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Quality Education & Jobs Supporting I-16-2012 v. BennettArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. State of Arizona v. Debbie Lynn CopelandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Arizona for Abortion Access v. MontenegroArizona Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Compassionate v. adhs/nelsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API