Plugge Ex Rel. Arkansas for Representative Democracy v. McCuen
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
Petitioners, the Arkansas Farm Bureau and a group known as Arkansas for Representative Democracy, filed this original action against the Secretary of State under Amendment 7 to the Arkansas Constitution, attacking the sufficiency of the ballot title of the proposed Arkansas Term Limitation Amendment. On July 3, 1992, the sponsors of this proposed amendment filed their initiative petitions with the Secretary of State’s office to get their measure on the 1992 General Election ballot. The Secretary of State eventually approved the signatures and ballot title submitted by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Leigh v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Finn v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Hodges v. DawdySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Bradley v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Fletcher v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by388 opinions
- Bailey v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Donovan v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Jegley v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Kurrus Ex Rel. Arkansans to Protect Police, Libraries, Education, & Services (APPLES) v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 360Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
383 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.